A history of violence
By Khaled Diab
British-born ‘jihadis’ have been wreaking havoc at home and abroad for generations, lured by a heady mix of idealism, romance and rebellion.
Armed with eleventh-hour intelligence, security services were able to foil a conspiracy to blow up parliament and destroy the government by a fanatical sleeper cell of religious zealots led by a foreign-trained British convert.
Before this news causes undue alarm, this thwarted attack did not occur in the aftermath of the botched strikes in Glasgow and London over the weekend. The convert in question was not a Muslim and he did not receive his foreign training in Afghanistan or Iraq.
This “jihadi” was of the pure-blooded English variety and his name, as every child learns at school, was Guy Fawkes. Born a Protestant, Fawkes converted to Catholicism at the age of 16 and went off, in the 1590s, to fight for the Spanish in the Spanish-occupied Netherlands.
When he returned to Britain, equipped with the explosives training he had received in Europe, he became involved in the Gun Powder Plot of 1605 to blow up the Houses of Parliament, thereby killing King James I and the Protestant aristocracy in the hope of replacing them with a Catholic monarchy.
The plot was a reaction to both the harsh anti-Catholicism instated by Queen Elizabeth I and the so-called Hampton Court Conference, through which the more moderate King James (of English-language Bible fame) tried to steer a middle course between extremist Puritans and Catholics. The plot served the interests of the Puritans very well and set back the cause of Catholic emancipation for at least another two centuries.
Although wits have often quipped that Fawkes was the “only man ever to enter parliament with honourable intentions”, the English have condemned him to eternal damnation right here on Earth by burning his effigy every year and urging the world to “remember, remember the fifth of November”. The only thing going for the poor bloke is that we are all (men and women), in a bizarre twist of etymology, “guys” now.
The Catholics were probably the first group in modern Britain to be stigmatised collectively as “the enemy within” for the actions of a miniscule minority – as well as their association with their coreligionists in other parts of the world. Another group were the Irish.
name that would befit a modern Muslim salafist organisation, the Irish Republican Brotherhood (aka Fenian), one of the precursors to
the IRA, carried out attacks against British interests in
Whether or not the Brotherhood advanced the cause of Irish independence is open to question. What is certain is that their armed tactics led to the collective stigmatisation of the Irish citizens of and immigrants to Britain, no matter how much the Irish community condemned the attacks or tried to distance themselves from them.
And British radicals have not just limited themselves to British soil. Much has been made of the lone British Muslims opposed to British foreign policy who have ended up in Afghanistan or Iraq. But there are plenty of earlier precedents of Britons taking up arms to change British foreign policy or for the glory of a distant cause.
Lord Byron was not just
Byron was perhaps the most prominent of the Philhellenes, volunteers from the European and American aristocracy who - besotted by visions of classical Greece – took up arms against the Ottoman Empire in the Greek War of Independence. In 1823, Byron spent an enormous £4,000 – around £10m in today’s money – of his own money to refit the overstretched Greek fleet and increase its fighting capacity. But as he sailed to do battle, his life was cut short by a fever. In fact, it was Byron's intervention that drew Britain reluctantly into the conflict after the Ottomans failed to assert their dominance.
While there has been a tiny trickle of British Muslims going off to fight as “enemy combatants” abroad, earlier conflicts were like a magnet for the young and idealistic. The Spanish Civil War in the 1930s drew hundreds of Britons, including George Orwell. In fact, it is estimated that 2,000 British citizens joined the International Brigades against Spain's as yet uncrowned rightwing dictator Francisco Franco. Again, this was at loggerheads with Britain's declared position of neutrality in the war.
receiving British backing in the form of the Balfour Declaration of 1917 to establish a homeland in
The earlier situations of the Catholics, Irish and Jews provide lessons both for the British mainstream and the Muslim community. It illustrates that we have been here before and that the situation of contemporary Muslims is by no means unique. In fact, Muslims can draw some consolation that, by today's more tolerant standards, they enjoy better protection than previous shunned minorities. In addition, it shows that, with time and effort on the part of inspired community leaders, a minority can become well-integrated and accepted.
For mainstream society, it is important to recall that, despite concerns aroused by the tiny number of violent extremists, people should not let their fear guide them into collectively punishing a minority – as has occurred so many times before – or giving up their hard-earned freedoms to a potentially cynical political establishment in the name of security.
This column appeared in The Guardian Unlimited’s Comment is Free section on 4 July 2007. Read the related discussion.
A war on error
June 2007 – It is time to dispel the myths surrounding Muslims – namely, that we are all terrorist anti-feminist teetotallers. Read on
A war on error (2)
June 2007 – It is time to dispel the myths that conservative Muslims often propagate about 'the west'. Read on
Conversion is not a crime
December 2005 – Muriel Degauque has the dubious distinction of being the first white European female suicide bomber. Shocking as this is, suggestions that we have reached a dangerous turning point and that converts are brainwashed fanatics and their partners are comic-book villains are unfair to the vast majority of converts and to non-converts married to Muslims. Read on
A revision of Salman Rushdie’s vision –
We need ijtihadis, not jihadis
September 2005 – Salman Rushdie’s proposed Islamic Reformation touches on the urgent need for reform in most Muslim societies. But his vision needs serious revision if it is to work. Read on
April 2005 – Khaled Diab and Katleen Maes examine the myths driving anti-Islamic fervour in the EU. Read on
ã2007 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website is the copyright of Khaled Diab.