Madrid for the people

 

Some 15 years after the Madrid conference which launched the now defunct Israeli-Palestinian peace process, former statesmen and stateswomen from both sides got together to try to revive the quest for peace. What we now need is to complement this crème-de-la-crème peacemaking with a gritty ‘Madrid for the people’, Khaled Diab argues in a letter to former Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami, one of the figures who spearheaded the initiative.

 

February 2007

 

Dear Mr Ben-Ami

 

I have read your article which appeared in Ha’aretz and was republished by Common Ground New Service. I also applaud your convening of Madrid+15. It pleased me because I had called for a similar gathering (which I called Madrid II) in an article I wrote last year.

 

Your opinion about internationalising the quest for peace is interesting in that it seeks to create a new momentum. There is no doubt that robust international engagement will help enhance the situation and close the gap between the two sides. However, like you suggested regarding Condoleeza Rice’s visit, we should not hold our breath: Washington is not interested, Europe is too divided, the Arab world is ineffectual and the UN is powerless. In addition, like previous attempts, such as the unofficial Geneva Accords, it is essentially an exercise conducted by what you could call the ‘peace elite’.

 

Besides, no deal struck at the political level will work without a groundswell of popular opinion to see it through. If any lessons can be drawn from Oslo, it is that there was little public ownership of the project – either on the Palestinian or Israeli sides – and this contributed significantly to the failure of the process.

 

At the moment, there is too much polarisation and demonisation on the two sides, which disinclines already reluctant politicians from making an earnest attempt to relaunch the peace process. In fact, a recent experiment in dialogue between the two sides has convinced me that Israelis and Arabs have a common enemy: their complete distrust and fear of the other side. Most Palestinians and Israelis do not believe that the other side is earnest in their desire for peace. The only way to overcome this lack of trust is through direct dialogue, people to people.

 

Any new peace initiative, in my humble view, needs to start from the bottom and travel up – and not from the top down, as has traditionally been the case. It is civil society and ordinary citizens that need to drive home to politicians the urgency of reaching a settlement. I understand that you are contemplating launching a follow-up to the Madrid+15 conference. The first gathering was made up almost exclusively of former Arab, Israeli and International statesmen and stateswomen. This should be complemented by making the second meeting a true civil society forum, bringing together every colour of Israeli, Palestinian, Arab and international NGO to discuss the outlines of a ‘people’s peace’ which they can then take to the political leadership as an example of what can be achieved. You called the Oslo process an exercise in ‘make believe’. If we are to transform the current situation into a realistic quest for peace, this cannot be done without the people and a real two-way grassroots dialogue.

 

May peace (salam/shalom) be with us

 

This letter was e-mailed on 11 February 2007 to the Toledo International Centre for Peace which is headed by Shlomo Ben-Ami.

 

 

 

Digg!

 

Post comment

 

Further reading

Read the Salom Now! draft manifesto

 

Madrid II: towards a civil peace in the Middle East

November 2006 – Prompted by the dire situation in Gaza, Spain, France and Italy have floated an unexpected Middle East peace drive. This initiative will almost certainly join other similar aborted road maps and peace plans slowly decaying in the graveyard of international diplomacy. What the EU needs to do is to abandon the deadlocked political level and organise a high-profile Madrid II conference targeted at civil society to set in motion a ‘people’s peace process’. Read on

 

How I learned to start worrying and hate the bomb

November 2006 – With North Korea’s recent nuclear test and Iran’s suspected nuclear designs, Khaled Diab explains why he learned to start worrying and hate the bomb and suggests how the proliferation of nuclear weapons can best be arrested – and reversed. Read on

Give ‘salom’ a chance

September 2006 – The best lessons to draw from Lebanon and Gaza are that all sides lost the battle and the only way for everyone to win the war is through peaceful means. Politicians have shown a lack of imagination and willpower and so it is up to ordinary Arabs and Israelis to lead them down the path to salam/shalom (peace). It is high time to demand Salom Now! Read on

 

Salom now!

Reaching out for a people’s peace in the Middle East

Peace is so important to Arabs and Israelis that they use it to greet friends and strangers a like – ‘salam’/’shalom’, they say. Despite this, the Middle East appears to be increasingly falling prey to new conflicts. Perhaps the oldest and most intractable of these is the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly its Israeli-Palestinian component. Read on

 

Using a carrot and stick for peace

September 2006 – Given the fragile situation in Lebanon, the pledge by EU member states to provide troops to police the UN-backed ceasefire was well-timed. However, to avoid a fresh crisis from erupting, Europe will have to aid efforts to forge lasting peace in the Middle East. Read on

 

Salom now!

Mobilising the untapped power of Arab and Israeli peaceniks

August 2006 – Arabs and Israelis have a common way of greeting people and it is to wish them ‘peace’. As advocates of violent solutions chalk up another victory in the Middle East and the international community fails the test again in Lebanon and Gaza, the time has come for Arab and Israeli citizens to join forces in a broad-based regional coalition to work towards salam/shalom… now.

Part I – Silent world

Part II – Peace begins at home

 

Crisis in Lebanon and Gaza

From complete failure to comprehensive solutions

July 2006 – Israel’s massive onslaught against Lebanon – and before that Gaza – reveals a monumental failure on the part of the international community to prevent an avoidable tragedy. Now it is up to the European Union to avoid a replay of 1982 and revive the idea of a comprehensive solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Read on

 
The EU’s new Palestine dilemma

February 2006 – It may be better for the EU to provide more carrots and fewer sticks for Hamas, writes Khaled Diab. Read on

 

Dressed to kill –

Under the cloak of Bush’s foreign policy

December 2005 – Jeff Sommers, Khaled Diab and Charles Woolfson expose what lies beneath the cloak of US President George W Bush’s foreign policy. Read on

 

Time to rethink the EU’s role in the Middle East

January 2005 – If Yasser Arafat’s death is to signify anything more than the symbolic start of a new era, the European Union must radically rethink its role as a mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to persuade the two peoples to work towards a new dawn. Read on

 

Commission wants closer EU-Israeli ties

January 2005 – The European Commission and the EU’s former envoy to the Middle East have both come out in favour of enhancing economic and political ties with Israel. But critics question the wisdom of extending a policy of good neighbourhood to a country that has done little to make the neighbourhood a safer place to live. Read on

 

ã2007 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website is the copyright of Khaled Diab.