Menu

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

Arabs and Israelis held hostage by a common enemy

Khaled Diab

Salom Now! And METalks are two experimental initiatives which sought to rewrite the script of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and give ordinary people a starring role in the quest for peace. Those involved experienced profound changes to their outlook and took the first steps towards forging a new, more inclusive narrative for the Middle East. However, such popular, grassroots action is held hostage by some common enemies: despair, hatred, antipathy and distrust.

 

February 2007

Part I – War and elusive peace

Part II – Talking under fire

Part III – Dangerous liaisons

Part IV – Constructive ideas

Part V – Let’s talk about you and ME

Part VI – Terrorised by a common enemy

Part VII – Existential angst

Part VIII – Moving forward

 

Existential angst

It would seem that the passage of several generations has not entirely rid the Israelis of the existential angst triggered by the holocaust, and they project subconsciously that excessive fear and distrust on to their Arab neighbours, even though the Arabs played no role in the mass murder of Jews.

 

Arabs have also not fully come to terms with the ‘original sin’ of Israel’s creation, especially since it is seen as a painful legacy of European imperialism and is a symbol of dashed Arab nationalist aspirations. The ‘naqba’ of 1948 and the ‘naksa’ of 1967 still weigh heavily on the Arab conscience and pride.

 

“I respect your idea and I think you are a great writer, but we can never hide the hate in our hearts for the people who took out land, children, jobs, and our everything...never... even if we tried to!” wrote ‘BabY_D@lA3’, an Arab-American student based in Texas.

 

“Any Israeli you meet will be very nice to you and will sing the praises of peace with anyone except Palestinians living in Palestine. That’s a red line to them,” an Arab poster, ‘3arees Loq6a’, said. “That same Israeli who is having rational discussions with you will grab his gear and go kill Palestinians.”

 

In addition, quite a few Arabs believe that the majority of Israelis support territorial expansion and would ultimately, even if it takes centuries, want to control all the land between the Nile and the Euphrates.

 

There is also the issue of military swagger. Israel’s so-called ‘deterrent posture’ and the arrogance bred by the 1967 walk-over disinclines many Israelis, particularly among the political elites, to compromise and lures them into believing that there can be a military resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

 

In the Arab mind, 1967 is no less significant. It is no coincidence that Egypt’s victory in the first phase of the 1973 war – before the USA became involved – led to the Camp David peace accords because it helped restore Egypt’s pride and gave Israel a taste of potential defeat.

 

Although 1967 has led most Arabs to realise that war with Israel is futile, insanely some extremists would like to inflict a similarly humiliating defeat on Israel to regain a semblance of pride. “In case you hadn’t noticed, the land was grabbed by violent means and cannot be returned otherwise,” ‘Martyrology’ claimed, expressing a still-popular belief in the Middle East.

 

“Sacrificing other people’s lives for abstract ideas seems like – how can I put it nicely? – such a macho idea of justice, so mixed up with pride, so devoid of compassion,” opines Marina Werbeloff.

 

Read on

 

Digg!

 

Post comment

 

Further reading

Read the Salom Now! draft manifesto

 

Madrid II: towards a civil peace in the Middle East

November 2006 – Prompted by the dire situation in Gaza, Spain, France and Italy have floated an unexpected Middle East peace drive. This initiative will almost certainly join other similar aborted road maps and peace plans slowly decaying in the graveyard of international diplomacy. What the EU needs to do is to abandon the deadlocked political level and organise a high-profile Madrid II conference targeted at civil society to set in motion a ‘people’s peace process’. Read on

 

How I learned to start worrying and hate the bomb

November 2006 – With North Korea’s recent nuclear test and Iran’s suspected nuclear designs, Khaled Diab explains why he learned to start worrying and hate the bomb and suggests how the proliferation of nuclear weapons can best be arrested – and reversed. Read on

Give ‘salom’ a chance

September 2006 – The best lessons to draw from Lebanon and Gaza are that all sides lost the battle and the only way for everyone to win the war is through peaceful means. Politicians have shown a lack of imagination and willpower and so it is up to ordinary Arabs and Israelis to lead them down the path to salam/shalom (peace). It is high time to demand Salom Now! Read on

 

Salom now!

Reaching out for a people’s peace in the Middle East

Peace is so important to Arabs and Israelis that they use it to greet friends and strangers a like – ‘salam’/’shalom’, they say. Despite this, the Middle East appears to be increasingly falling prey to new conflicts. Perhaps the oldest and most intractable of these is the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly its Israeli-Palestinian component. Read on

 

Using a carrot and stick for peace

September 2006 – Given the fragile situation in Lebanon, the pledge by EU member states to provide troops to police the UN-backed ceasefire was well-timed. However, to avoid a fresh crisis from erupting, Europe will have to aid efforts to forge lasting peace in the Middle East. Read on

 

Salom now!

Mobilising the untapped power of Arab and Israeli peaceniks

August 2006 – Arabs and Israelis have a common way of greeting people and it is to wish them ‘peace’. As advocates of violent solutions chalk up another victory in the Middle East and the international community fails the test again in Lebanon and Gaza, the time has come for Arab and Israeli citizens to join forces in a broad-based regional coalition to work towards salam/shalom… now.

Part I – Silent world

Part II – Peace begins at home

 

Crisis in Lebanon and Gaza –

From complete failure to comprehensive solutions

July 2006 – Israel’s massive onslaught against Lebanon – and before that Gaza – reveals a monumental failure on the part of the international community to prevent an avoidable tragedy. Now it is up to the European Union to avoid a replay of 1982 and revive the idea of a comprehensive solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Read on

 
The EU’s new Palestine dilemma

February 2006 – It may be better for the EU to provide more carrots and fewer sticks for Hamas, writes Khaled Diab. Read on

 

Dressed to kill –

Under the cloak of Bush’s foreign policy

December 2005 – Jeff Sommers, Khaled Diab and Charles Woolfson expose what lies beneath the cloak of US President George W Bush’s foreign policy. Read on

 

Time to rethink the EU’s role in the Middle East

January 2005 – If Yasser Arafat’s death is to signify anything more than the symbolic start of a new era, the European Union must radically rethink its role as a mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to persuade the two peoples to work towards a new dawn. Read on

 

Commission wants closer EU-Israeli ties

January 2005 – The European Commission and the EU’s former envoy to the Middle East have both come out in favour of enhancing economic and political ties with Israel. But critics question the wisdom of extending a policy of good neighbourhood to a country that has done little to make the neighbourhood a safer place to live. Read on

 

ã2007 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website is the copyright of Khaled Diab.