Diabolic Digest
Arab
world and African nations both struggle for EU-style unity
As the European Union prepares to expand eastwards, it success in achieving security and prosperity through economic integration has become an example for the rest of the world, yet Arabs and Africans are finding it tough to forge their own regional blocs. Khaled Diab and Katleen Maes report.
March 2004
YEMEN recently called for the 22-member Arab
League to be reinvented as an EU-style Arab Union to give the region more clout
on the world stage. Meanwhile, the League’s popular secretary-general, Amr
Moussa, has placed reform firmly on the agenda of the ageing 59-year-old body’s
upcoming summit later this month (29-30 March).
With all the talk about discord and the EU
punching below its weight internationally, some Europeans may be baffled that
any region would want to follow their model. But a growing number of Arabs and
Africans see Europe’s unifying experience as an object lesson in liberal
pragmatism. Many Arabs wonder why it is that, after six decades of trying, a
league of countries speaking the same language – with such notable exceptions
as the Comoros Islands and Djibouti – has not yet blossomed into a full-bodied
union despite early promise.
Before the guns had fallen silent in Europe’s
Second World War, seven states launched the Arab League in 1945 to build a
post-colonial era of prosperity and independence. This unifying dream reached
its zenith in the 1950s and 1960s secular pan-Arab movement. Today, Arabs are
left with a third division league creaking under the weight of its own inertia.
“To stall on reform is to declare the end of any form of collective Arab
system,” Tunisian daily Al Shorouq warned bleakly.
But specialists say the league’s take-off
problems stem from deeper political and social troubles. “The League’s problem
is not a technical one, it’s a political and societal one,” Pierre Vanrie, a
consultant policy analyst at MEDEA, a Brussels-based think tank, told the European
Voice. “The problem is that there’s not enough democracy in the Arab World.
All the experiments of the 50s and 60s were not successful because they were
initiated by dictators.”
He says that more internal political reform by
member states is urgently needed. “If the Arab League is to become more
effective, it first requires the Arab World to become more democratic,” Vanrie
asserts. In addition, Arab commentators point out that the rivalries for
regional leadership between Arab leaders have stifled the masses’ desire for
unity.
Some Arabs also pin part of the blame on
outside forces, such as the West’s addiction to Gulf oil, and conflicts. The
Israeli-Palestinian conflict – which has spawned millions of stateless refugees
– has been an open wound for over half a century. Then there were the horrors
of first and second Gulf Wars. But it is the third Gulf War that, many Arabs
fear, has hurt regionalism the most. Iraq may have lost a bloodthirsty
dictator, but it has gained, in the minds of Arabs, an oil-thirsty superpower
that has resurrected the painful spectre of colonialism. In addition, internal
insurgencies in Algeria and Sudan, as well as the human rights record of some
regimes in the region, do not inspire optimism.
However, the outlook is not entirely bleak.
Countries that were once seen to be at the rearguard of Arab progressiveness
are liberalising their political landscape. He points to the example of Qatar –
home to outspoken news channel Al Jazeera – and the United Arab Emirates. “Some
years ago, no one expected Morocco to be one of the most democratic countries
in the region, so there may be more pleasant surprises to come,” observes
Vanrie.
Meanwhile, Africa is forging ahead with its
nearly two-year-old EU-inspired African Union. The AU hopes to bring an end to
the conflicts, poverty and disease plaguing the continent. Libya, Nigeria and
South Africa spearheaded the efforts to overhaul the ineffectual ‘talking shop
for dictators’ known as the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), which was
created in 1963 to chart an autonomous course for Africa following colonialism.
Out of the rubble of the OAU emerged the
African Union at the Durban Summit of 2002.
Like the EU, the AU will have a common parliament, a central bank and a
court of justice. In so doing, Africans have decided to depend on themselves as
much as the outside world. “The political will is there,” Emmanuel
Djomatchua-Toko, the AU’s permanent representative in Brussels, said on the
pages of EV. “Primarily, we need to count on our own resources.”
African leaders have already taken tentative
steps to give their fledgling union some teeth with the AU peacekeeping mission
in Burundi, and the creation of the African Court on Human and People’s Rights
in January. Nevertheless, comprehensive and credible conflict resolution and
prevention strategies still need to be worked out to address the raging
conflicts – from Sudan to Sierra Leone – plaguing the continent.
Last week’s AU summit – attended by 39 African
leaders – took a major step in this direction by agreeing to create a Peace and
Security Council (PSC), inspired by the UN’s Security Council. However, some
experts are doubtful about its effectiveness. “The PSC is going to fulfil a
very important role in theory, but in practice I don't know how much effect it
is going to have,” Adala Ochieng, an analyst at the Africa Peace Forum, told
AFP. Others warn that these new instruments
will mean little if they become dead letters. “We have to make sure that all
member countries genuinely adhere to the… guidelines and vision of the AU in
order to transform the continent,” Heneri Dzinotyiwei, a political analyst at
the University of Zimbabwe, said on AllAfrica.com.
Although Africa is far poorer than Europe, the
obstacles to economic union are similar to those the EU has had to grapple with
– an enormous divergence in living standards and economic development.
Similarly, monetary union will be difficult under such circumstance. However,
francophone West and Central Africa already operate under a single currency.
The AU’s New Partnership for Africa’s
Development (NEPAD) aims to improve the continent’s economic and political
situation radically. Last month, it launched its peer review process.
"Nowhere in the world has any head of state ever dared to declare himself
prepared to be scrutinised by other heads of state,” argues Senegalese
sociologist Marie Angelique Savané, who heads the intitiative.
Some analysts believe that the challenges
facing the continent will prove insurmountable and others question whether the
AU’s outside-in approach can work. Africans have no illusions that war,
disease, poverty and dictators stand in the way of prosperity, but they are
hopeful.
This article first appeared in the 4-10 March
2004 edition of the European Voice.
© Copyright 2004 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved.
ã2004 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website
is the copyright of Khaled Diab.