Diabolic Digest
Sharon
court ruling clears the way for possible Brussels invitation
June 2002
Sharon had shied from visiting Brussels for
fear of legal complications ever since the case was launched last year. The EU,
which has regarded the case as a distraction from the core issues, now hopes to
focus its full energies to finding a path out of the escalating
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which may include informal talks in Brussels.
“We take note of this issue, but it is not
central to the conflict in the Middle East,” David Harley, spokesman for
European Parliament President Pat Cox, told the European Voice. “Mr Sharon
remains the elected prime minister of Israel and we want to concentrate on all
the elements necessary to resolve this conflict.”
The European Parliament had recently extended
an informal invitation to besieged Palestinian President Yasser Arafat, but he
was unable to leave his headquarters in Ramallah. Despite US President George W
Bush’s demand for new Palestinian leadership, Harley did not rule out extending
the invitation to both leaders to hold talks in Brussels, but said the parliament
was not yet entertaining such plans.
However, Harley noted that the EU was putting
its weight behind the idea of an international peace conference –mediated by
the so-called quartet of the EU, the United States, Russia and the United
Nations– to help break the deadlock in the Middle East.
Off the hook
The Belgian appeals court said on Wednesday
that Sharon could not be tried under an ambitious 1993 law, which allows local
courts to prosecute violations of the Geneva Convention wherever in the world
they occur, because he was not in Belgium. "If a person is
not found on the territory, we find it inadmissible," the three judges
said in their 22-page ruling.
The verdict drew
sighs of relief from Israeli quarters and will undoubtedly ease the strained
ties between the two countries. “We’re very content with the ruling,” Haim
Assaraf, first secretary at the Israeli mission in Brussels, told the European
Voice. “This is a very good chance to reinvigorate relations between Belgium
and Israel.”
Lawyers representing
23 Palestinian survivors of the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre by
Israeli-backed Lebanese
Phalangist militiamen slammed the ruling. An Israeli inquiry at the time found
the then defence minister Sharon, mastermind of Israel’s invasion of Lebanon,
to bear indirect but personal responsibility for the atrocities.
Michael Verhaeghe, one of the lawyers
representing the Palestinians, sounded a defiant note to reporters following
the hearing. “We are not satisfied with this,” he said, vowing to push on with
a supreme court appeal. International human rights groups joined the chorus of
condemnation, expressing disapproval that this avenue for victims of atrocities
had been shut.
The outcome of this
case is likely to affect proceedings brought in Belgium against several other
heads of state, including the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Fidel Castro
of Cuba.
An edited version of this article appeared in
the 27 June to 3 July 2002 edition of the European Voice. © Copyright 2002 The
Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved.
ã2005 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website
is the copyright of Khaled Diab.