Diabolic Digest
From
nature to naturalisation
|
|
|
Photo: ©2005 K. Diab |
July 2005
To be classed as a real Belgian, contenders
have to be either abroad or dead. That is the opinion of Bert Kruismans and
Peter Perceval in their book België voor beginnelingen, an entertaining
look at Belgian identity.
This amusing book is disguised as a beginner’s
guide to Belgium – ostensibly targeted at newcomers to give them valuable
insights into how Belgians live and think. However, it is actually a comical
exploration of the defining stereotypes and quirks of the Belgian identity. It
is divided into a number of sections, each dissecting a different aspect of the
national psyche: how Belgians view their homes, their neighbours, their work,
taxes, the government and food.
The oft-hilarious caricature of the typical Belgian
that emerges is of a hermetically private food-lover with a penchant for
building houses and garden sheds – and decorating them with fake ornaments –
who harbours an innate distrust of authority and engages in the national
pastime of evading taxes and doing things “in the black”.
“The further we are from home, the stronger our
sense of nationhood,” the authors write. “It is as if we are ashamed of the
country as long as we are inside it. But, abroad, Belgians discover their true ID
and become unashamedly patriotic.” Especially, they point out, when it comes to
spreading the word on liquid refreshment – their mission being to teach
foreigners how to savour ‘real’ beer rather than the ‘dishwater’ they drink.
Personally, I don’t recall witnessing such
missionary zeal from my wife, Katleen, when we first met all those years ago,
even though it was in a Cairo bar. I don’t recall her ordering the waiter to
take back the Egyptian Stella – not the same as the Artois variety – and use it
to mop the floor, and I don’t remember her standing up and preaching to the
friends who introduced us or the heathen hip reclining in the dimly lit pews
about their sacrilegious drinking habits.
In fact, she holds that one distinguishing mark
of Belgians – particularly compared with their neighbours – is their modesty
and the fact that they do not go around advertising themselves, to the extent
that they often undersell themselves and their achievements.
Nevertheless, Belgians seem to have won many
converts to the cause. In fact, Westvleteren Twaalf, brewed in silent reverence
by trappist monks, was recently voted the best beer in the world, despite the
fact that it is only available at the monastery shop.
Sadly, the monks who brew the beer are not so
pleased with how well the message is spreading. In fact, it so aggravated them
that Brother Joris, one of the brewer monks, took the extraordinary step of
speaking to the press. “Such a title will only lead to more recognition, more
demand and more work,” he complained in a rare interview.
Given that he is a trappist, one wonders
whether he actually spoke these words or wrote them down. My research reveals
that trappists don’t take an actual vow of silence. However, their other vows
render them effectively silent, except when absolutely necessary – and one
supposes brewing too much beer would distract them from their prayers.
My interest in ‘Belgianness’ flows much deeper
than a beer barrel – as well as chocolate and fries. Having recently gained
Belgian nationality myself, I found it intriguing that these two respected
authorities – one is a just judge (rechtvaardige rechter) and the
smartest person in the world (slimste mens ter werld), while the other is a
playwright – suggest that the best way to express my newfound identity was
either to fly or to die. Since I’d
rather cross a physical than a metaphysical frontier, I’ll have to put their
theory to the test next time we run into compatriots abroad.
Since I received my brief letter of
congratulations, I have caught myself pondering profound questions of identity:
does having Belgian nationality make me more of one than I was before I got it?
Am I any less Egyptian? Does it change anything about who I am/was? Can one
draw a clear before and after line? What exactly does it mean to be a Belgian?
And why exactly do they call the process ‘naturalisation’ – does that mean you
were some kind of imitation beforehand and then you were transformed into the
genuine article? Is it a form of bureaucratic poetry depicting one’s
documentary metamorphosis from foreign caterpillar to native butterfly – a
cross between Kafka and Wordsworth?
My quest to come to terms with this new aspect
of my identity has taken me high and low – and family and friends have provided
a helping hand. For instance, the Kruismans-Perceval book – the first complete
book I’ve read in Dutch – was given to me by my father-in-law as preparation
for the big day. One friend gave me a book of Belgian jokes after my ‘naturalisation’,
and another advised me to get myself a Flemish flag and join the
ultra-nationalist zangfeest every year. I wonder how well I’d blend in
there.
I have also recently been to the Visionary
Belgium exhibition, where sublime Margrittes are juxtaposed near a bizarre
shit-making machine, and attended the open day at the lavishly equipped Flemish
Parliament. Always one for a good party, we will probably be joining revellers
on the streets of Brussels on 21 July to celebrate Belgium 175th
anniversary.
Ever since I moved to Belgium, I have
endeavoured to gain a better understanding of the politics, culture and history
of my wife’s homeland, and sometimes find, being a journo, I am better informed
than some locals.
A few months on and I’m beginning to wear my
loose-fitting identity a little more snugly. But I am not certain that I will
ever be able to persuade anyone completely of my Belgianness. On the surface,
at least, I feel like something of an impostor.
Having grown up in the UK and Egypt, I also do
not sound typically Belgian and, despite the fact that I have made massive
linguistics strides in this multilingual land, I doubt I will ever fool
anyone’s ears.
I speak Dutch fluently now but – having picked it
up as an adult – I don’t sound like a native. I certainly sound like a daft
foreigner in French: a language I can use if I need to, but the results are
neither elegant nor pretty.
But this underscores the complexity of identity
in the modern world – i.e. that you should never judge a passport by its cover,
or a person by their appearance. Prior to joining the ranks of binationals, I
wasn’t entirely satisfied with my designated identity as an Egyptian: I feel it
does not tell the whole story of who I am. Indeed, there’s more to many people
I know – including my wife and numerous friends – than meets the eye – what
with all the cultural overlap, mixing and cross-fertilisation going on.
Both my parents are Egyptian – although my
father is now a UK citizen as well – so that makes me biological an Egyptian,
whatever that means. However, culturally the tale is more twisted. There is, of
course, an Egyptian part of me, but there is also an English part and now a
fledgling Belgian aspect.
I find that my mixed upbringing and contact
with numerous cultures has made me relate to all of them and none of them. In
Egypt, there was strong cultural and linguistic cement linking me to the place,
but my progressive lifestyle and views and different frame of reference made me
feel somewhat alienated.
Similarly, many people, when they hear me
speak, get the impression that I am a Brit. Indeed, I feel that I have a lot of
history in and a certain affinity towards the UK. But its cultural insularity
and military adventurism is a bit of a put-off. I also find it unfortunate that
British officialdom goes out of its way to make me feel like Johnny Foreigner
whenever I visit.
Despite my strong Egyptian and British aspects,
there is a less visible – and nascent – Belgian aspect to my personality. In
addition to being married to a Belgian, I have spent the last four years of my
life in Belgium and so my frames of reference have become intimately tied with
the ebbs and flows of life in this country.
The far right might see all this as a good
excuse for cancelling the fast-track law (the snel Belg wet) that
allowed me to become Belgian. But just because I have a complex identity does
not mean that I do not deserve to be recognised as a member of society.
Besides, complexity and confusion are the order of the day in this trilingual
salad of a country.
I think offering people full membership of
society makes sound practical and moral sense. Being a productive member of
society, I feel I am entitled to the same rights as everyone else. And being
embraced as fully fledged member of the greater family, so to speak, I feel I
have a stake in this country which can only enhance my affinity towards it.
Curiously, I have been told that my cultural
transformation is moving ahead quite rapidly. We recently decided to buy a
house and, as everyone knows, Belgians have a brick in their stomach.
Despite this perilous mutation, my dream is to
become a world citizen, a member of the human race. If they ever start handing
out those passports, I’ll be first in the queue.
ã2005 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website
is the copyright of Khaled Diab.