Menu Back
issues About
Diabolic Digest
Migrating from the margins
As a
reflection of Belgium's multicultural reality, just under 10 percent of the
country's population is foreign. While the EU component of this population has
the right to vote in local elections in Belgium and in European elections, the
non-EU contingent goes mostly unheard and unseen on the political radar screen.
By Khaled Diab
November 2003
Despite enjoying many of the same rights as
Belgians, thousands of long-term legal residents live in the political shadows.
Whether of African, Middle Eastern, Asian, Eastern European, or American
origin, these people lead their lives - for the most part - as decent,
law-abiding citizens. These expatriates work, pay taxes, contribute to the
welfare system, and obey the country's legal code but they cannot vote.
That means they may walk and talk like
citizens, but they differ in one important respect: although the decisions of
the political apparatus affect them, they cannot hold politicians to account.
Such political muteness can be frustrating and alienating because it sends a
message that immigrants are welcome to pay but that doesn't give them the right
to play.
The right to participate politically has inched
a small step closer. A Senate select committee adopted a draft bill that
proposes to grant non-Union immigrants similar local voting rights as their EU
counterparts. According to the proposed legislation, expats from outside the EU
who have been living here for five years or more will be granted the right to
vote in municipal elections but not to stand as candidates.
The proposed right to vote is 'passive',
meaning that for a person to be granted it they have to seek it actively. In
addition to having to register, the draft legislation proposes that prospective
voters must also sign a declaration that they understand Belgian law and will
uphold the constitution.
Although this is obviously designed to ease
popular fears about the ramifications of granting expatriates the vote, it is
entirely unnecessary and somewhat insulting. Voting is a fundamental democratic
right that cannot be preconditioned regardless of a person's personal views.
On a more practical level, just like citizens,
immigrants engage in a tacit social contract that they will play by the legal
and constitutional rules or face the consequences. Moreover, putting obstacles
in the way of immigrants wishing to exercise this fundamental democratic right
actually hurts the cause of democracy.
Political resistance
The usual suspects on the extreme right spoke
out vocally against the draft bill: the Vlaams Blok in Flanders and its smaller
cousin, the National Front (FN) in Walloonia. Although all the other
Walloon parties expressed their support for the legislation, their Flemish
counterparts were more reticent. On the Dutch-speaking side, only the socialist
SP.A and its ally Spirit came out clearly in favour, while the liberal VLD and
the Christian-democrat CD&V expressed reservations.
The leader of the ruling coalition, the VLD,
believes that only naturalised immigrants should have the right to vote.
In the case of the Vlaams Blok and the FN,
their motivation is easy to figure out. Convinced, for their own xenophobic
reasons, that the country is overrun by foreigners, they want immigrants to
leave, they don't want to make them feel more at home. The Vlaams Blok couches
its arguments in the alarming terms that allowing people with 'alien values' to
wield a lobby can derail the course of democracy and threaten the very fabric
of society. What the VB really means by this is that giving non-EU residents
the right to vote will damage the party's chances at the polls since few
immigrants in their right mind would vote for them.
The motivation of their mainstream counterparts
is harder to pin down. Although xenophobia cannot be entirely ruled out, real
politick seems to be the main driving force behind their reservations. Given
that one recent poll found some 70 percent of Belgians are against granting
immigrants the vote, it is perhaps unsurprising that centre and centre-right
politicians are not lining up to defend the rights of this voiceless minority.
In a telling admission, some CD&V representatives have warned that granting
immigrants the vote could further bolster support for the Vlaams Blok.
With all this talk about the importance of
integrating immigrants, it rings a little hollow that there should be so much
resistance to this project from the political centre. Jeannine Leduc, a VLD
senator, cautioned that “the right to vote solves nothing” and it would
actually be “deceiving immigrants” to grant them it.
The senator is probably right that this
proposal will not solve the economic and social difficulties encountered by
many immigrants. However, it will send out a resounding vote of confidence in
the immigrant community and will tell them that they are valued and equal
members of society. Such an invitation to join the mainstream will also
encourage young immigrants to take a more constructive and positive attitude
towards their role in the community.
Redefining Citizen X
The question of immigrant voting rights is not
exclusively a Belgian issue but has an international dimension. European
countries and the United States are all grappling with this thorny issue. Italy
is currently embroiled in row over whether or not to grant immigrants limited
voting rights, which has provoked vocal opposition from the far-right Northern
League.
Across the Atlantic, local authorities in the
United States are also struggling with the issue. New York is currently considering
whether to allow green card holding foreign residents - who make up a
significant percentage of the city's population - to vote in municipal
elections.
As a testimony to the increasingly cosmopolitan
world in which we live, it is estimated that in the EU alone between 15 and 20
million people are legally resident but are not nationals of any of the 15
member states. With Europe's growing economic need for new blood to keep the
economy turning and the welfare system alive for its ageing population, this
trend is set to rise.
Belgium and other parts of Europe need to learn
from the lessons of previous large-scale post-war migrations. They need to
address the frustration and marginalisation - and their attendant problems -
currently felt by second and third-generation immigrants and avoid this
occurring with more recent arrivals. The best way to do this is to regard
immigrants as more than human resources and expand the definition of
citizenship.
In the more fluid times before the concept of
the modern nation state took root, a citizen was simply the inhabitant of a
city or a town who was free to take part in its civic life. Our overly
restrictive definition of citizenry does not stand the test of the reality of
the modern world. One day, in the not too distant future, countries will find
themselves granting residents not only the right to vote in local elections but
also in national ones.
Despite the presence of the far right, Belgium
has long been at the avant garde of European progressiveness and tolerance. In
addition to being one of the founders of the EU, it has done much to give its
minorities more rights, such as legalising gay marriages. Regardless of whether
immigrants are 'aliens' or not, as productive members of society they have an
inalienable right to be heard.
This article appeared on Expatica on 21 November 2003.
ã2004 K. Diab. Unless otherwise stated, all the content on this website
is the copyright of Khaled Diab.